The recent exchange between Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci was instructive, and gave us insight into the origins of COVID19. As Senator Paul began to probe Fauci’s role in funding the Wuhan Laboratory and the hypothesis that the NIH, directed by Fauci, had been funding “gain of function” coronavirus research at that lab. Fauci, of course, got touchy and vehemently denied his involvement. When the former director, Robert Redfield, opined that COVID19 likely originated in the Wuhan Lab, Fauci, with no mention of evidence, summarily dismissed him. “That’s his opinion,” he stated, as if Redfield were just a layperson at the end of the bar. When Tucker Carlson challenged Fauci over the effectiveness of vaccines, Fauci responded by writing it off as “conspiracy theories.”
Early in the outbreak, evolutionary biologists Bret Weinsten
and Heather Heying raised the hypothesis that COVID19 had escaped from the lab
and were immediately savaged by the press as “conspiracy theorists,” and “right
wingers,” and “loons.”
“Conspiracy theorist” has now become the reflexive charge
flung at someone that proposes a plausible alternative hypothesis. Its use has become especially prevalent when a
skeptic is on to something, when someone has either distorted or actively
hidden relevant facts and data that are contrary to an espoused narrative. Like its sister term, “racist” or “systemic
racism,” it is employed to stop the discussion and stop further inquiry. In 4th grade schoolyard terms,
it’s telling you to “just shut up.”
But in addition to the COVID19 outbreak, over the past year,
we have had several events that defy the government and media narrative about
them.
The Capitol Insurrection and the death of officer Sicknick
The Capitol “Insurrection” on January 6 has been used to
justify fortifying the Capitol with national guard troops and encase it in
barbed wire, hold protesters in solitary confinement for months when their
actual only offense was trespassing, hiring outside firms and the USPS to spy
on social media accounts, and halt military operations to root out
“extremists.”
Yet, strange, incongruous facts are emerging. Film clips show officers ushering protesters
into the building, however. AOC flat out
lied about her whereabouts and her “fear for her life.” And the media pushed the narrative that five
people had died in the protest, and advanced the claim that Officer Sicknick
had died from being struck in the head with a fire extinguisher. None of this was true.
Most troubling was the death of Ashley Babbit, the unarmed
woman that appeared to be attempting to crawl through a broken window. Film of her shooting showed that armed
capitol guards were directly behind her.
She was given no warning. A gun
appeared and put her down. The identity
of the person that shot her was not revealed by the government and no charges
were brought against the officer, even though it was highly questionable
whether deadly force was justified.
All of these issues raise real questions over the
“insurrection,” and make a “Reichstag fire” alternative narrative something to
think about.
The Christmas Bombing
Early in the wee hours of Christmas morning while sugar
plums were still dancing in our heads, a bomb ripped through downtown Nashville,
near the AT&T communications center.
Oddly, the bomber(s) picked a time when it was almost certain that no
one would be around. The truck announced
a warning to evacuate before the bomb went off. That’s not how terrorists usually operate.
Within 48 hours, the F.B.I. had claimed that they had identified
the bomber through his DNA and announced that he was a “lone wolf.” So the F.B.I. really wants us to believe that
it is so efficient that it was able to identify the culprit, interview his
family, neighbors and coworkers, access his computer and phone and look through
his correspondence and social media accounts, all in 48 hours. Hmmm.
AP and Hamas
Before destroying the building that housed the Associated
Press and Hamas, the IDF gave ample warning to evacuate. The AP complained and asserted that it did
not know that the building also housed Hamas.
Right.
The Election
Much has been written about the midnight ballot drops, statistical anomalies and
odd behavior of officials in key swing states, so I won’t regurgitate assertions
here. But these anomalies and the fact
that the Biden campaign drew little enthusiasm raises serious questions about
the outcome.
Because we no longer have an independent inquiring press
that acts as a watchdog on government, we have learned to be very skeptical of
narratives. Time and time again, we have
seen the press either withhold information (as it did with Hunter Biden), distort
facts (as it did with the Covington kids) or outright lie (as it did with
officer Sicknick). When we cannot count
on independent journalists to dispassionately dig out the truth, we create our
own possible narratives.
And when we do, we are dismissed as conspiracy theorists.
Except, sometimes they turn out to be the most accurate
interpretation of facts.
No comments:
Post a Comment