I begin with a disclaimer.
I am neither a venture capital professional nor a real estate
professional. I do not pretend to be
able to pick out the next new disruptive wave in business and I do not find
real estate intrinsically interesting. Nor
have I done a deep dive into We Work’s financials. And I did not really begin to follow the We
Work story until last week.
But I have cleaned up dozens and dozens of corporate messes,
and helped fix or restructure scores more, and the We Work and Adam Neumann
drama immediately captured my attention.
Because we’ve seen this movie before.
Theranos Rerun.
As I began to dig into the articles, I was immediately
struck by the parallels between Adam Neumann and We Work and Elizabeth Holmes
and Theranos.
-
Holmes and Neumann both built a religious cult
based on grandiose claims, a persona and signature “look.” Holmes mimicked Steven Jobs, down to the
black turtleneck. Neumann had his high
school stoner look, complete with shoulder length hair. Theranos employees complained that they knew
where Holmes was in Jobs’s biography by the quotes she was spewing out. Even her voice was manufactured. Neumann brashly wished to be the first
trillionaire and bragged that he was “going to lease more space than they
[JPMorgan] do.”
-
Holmes and Neumann had a significant other that
was involved in the business. Elizabeth
Holmes had “Sonny” Balwani that was the enforcer, threatening employees with
legal action if they divulged “confidential” information (whether it was
confidential or not). Neumann had his
flaky wife Rebekah Paltrow Neumann, former actress and Adam’s “strategic
thought partner” or, as I call her “Chief Proselytizing Officer” who put out
vacuous mission statements for the company, like this treasure from the
company’s S-1 “We are a community company committed to maximum global
impact. Our mission is to elevate the
world’s consciousness.” Take a cleansing
breath and you could almost smell the incense burn. Her startup WeGrow is being shuttered.
-
Most importantly, each gained the admiration of
one or more respected individuals from the Establishment that lent
credibility. Holms had George Schulz;
Neumann had Jamie Dimon as his personal banker.
Each got someone credible to “fall in love” with them that provided air
cover for their mismanagement (and in Holmes’s case, outright fraud).
-
Each was an ego maniac that retained tight
control over the company. Holmes did it
through threats. Neumann did it with his
manipulation of stock ownership.
Neumann took the Theranos playbook, tweaked it a bit and
managed to extort $1.7 billion from Softbank.
Holmes was not so fortunate. She
will go to trial next year on fraud charges and her law firm quit because they
haven’t been paid. Holmes committed
fraud by manipulating data. Neumann (thus
far as it appears, manipulated only the desires of his lenders and investors.
My conclusion is everything.
We Work was a MASSIVE failure in several areas. In the dichotomy of Steven Kaplan at the Booth
School of Business, was this a failure of the horse or the jockey? I believe it was both on a massive scale. It was a failure of diligence on the part of
J.P. MorganChase. It was a failure
corporate governance (Neumann engaged in a myriad of suspect insider
transactions). It was a failure of balance
sheet management—servicing long term obligations with short term cash flows was
a built-in structural failure. (See Sam
Zell’s comments. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-33_A_YsWg)).
Ironically, in yesterday’s WSJ, SoftBank announced that
it was going to examine the corporate governance in its portfolio companies. Talk about locking the barn door after the
horses got out.
Why the We Work scares me.
-
Jamie Dimon has reputation of being one of the
best risk managers in the country.
Dimon earned his reputation at Citi by sidestepping the Long Term
Capital Management debacle. He further cemented his legacy during the
financial crisis of ’08 and talked about “fortress balance sheet.” Yet J.P. Morgan jumped in on this one with
both feet. They were in the equity, debt
and the investment banking portion.
Dimon “fell in love.” This leads
to two important questions. If Dimon can
get taken, who else? If J.P. Morgan can
do a pratfall, what else is out there in these financial institutions?
-
Worse, We Work gives legs to Elizabeth Warren’s
view of the world. Once of the basic
premises is that successful risk taking is rewarded and that this rising tide
lifts all boats. Neumann managed to
disrupt the lives of some 4,000 people (and in the end had to delay layoffs
because he didn’t even have the cash to pay their severance) and dissipated
billions of dollars in wealth and yet managed to pocket a cool billion, land a
$200 million consulting agreement and had his personal debt refinanced. This is a terrible sign that something in
the capitalist system is amiss. Even capitalist purist Cliff Asness posted, “It
[We Work] will pass. But, this story,
hopefully briefly, makes me see some of the appeal of socialism.” Frankly, I am surprised that Elizabeth Warren
hasn’t picked up on the We Work story. It
is a real black eye not just to the banking, real estate and venture capital
markets, but, I think, lends legitimacy to the complaints of Warren, Sanders,
AOC and people of their ilk. If I were
on Warren’s campaign committee, Neumann would be featured in our campaign ads.
-
We Works also bolster’s one of Peter Thiel’s assertions that innovation has
slowed dramatically, that we innovate in bytes and not stuff. There have been businesses that have married
technology to an old line business--- Dominoes comes to mind. Neumann tried to create an illusion that you
could defy financial constraints by bolting space maximizing algorithms and a
cultish corporate culture and failed spectacularly. We Work also provided evidence to support
Theil’s claim that there is just too much money around that funds don’t know
what to do with. And that leads them to
“want to believe” instead of applying a healthy dose of skepticism.
After all is said and done, Neumann’s empire crumbled when
his company’s story was scrutinized by the market rather than just the wise
ones at Softbank and JPMorgan.
There is wisdom in crowds.
No comments:
Post a Comment