This
week, Chicago was gripped by the Polar Vortex, a jet stream of frigid air and
wind that descended from Canada, plunging temperatures into the minus 20’s with
midday highs not reaching zero. For a
couple of days, the city was nearly paralyzed.
Many businesses and institutions closed.
The trains ran on reduced
schedules and the rail companies set fire to tracks to warm them. At the moment of contact, the frigid cold
took your breath away.
But
the Polar Vortex wasn’t the only thing that took my breath away this week. Following on the heels of New York’s new
abortion law, Virginia delegate Kathy Tran introduced a similar measure in that
state that would permit an abortion until birth. The video of her defense of the bill went
viral and was as stunning as the blast of Chicago’s winter wind off the river
and is available on YouTube:
Later, Virginia governor, Ralph Northam
defended Tran and her bill in a radio interview and goes much further,
suggesting that there may be instances where infanticide is permissible:
"When we talk about third trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of obviously the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way. [the proposed VA statute would reduce it to one] And it's done in cases were there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion."
"When we talk about third trimester abortions, these are done with the consent of obviously the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way. [the proposed VA statute would reduce it to one] And it's done in cases were there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's nonviable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion."
For
most of my adult life, I have been "uncomfortably pro-choice." In
college, and a little bit beyond, I was pro-life. Bernard Nathanson’s anti-abortion polemic,
Aborting America, published in 1979 had a strong influence on me, and by my
mid-twenties, I had known perhaps a half-dozen women that had had abortions and
all but one had expressed deep regrets about having one. But as I moved into my mid-twenties, I began
to shift into libertarianism. The
basic problem was that I could never convince myself with any certainty that I
knew the answer to the question of “when does life begin?” My liberal friends seemed to know with
certainty that life did not begin at conception and that it began somewhere
down the path to birth. My conservative
friends knew with certainty that life began at conception. I could never reach certainty in my mind in either
direction. My pro-life inclinations conflicted with my libertarian instincts and
libertarianism for the most part prevailed. I bought into the “safe, legal, and rare”
argument and the “our bodies, our choice” argument, and the libertarian view
that “if you are anti-abortion, don’t get one.”
But
I vastly underestimated Leftist Incrementalism.
But
over the past few years, I also have spent a great deal of time and effort
understanding the Holocaust, how it happened, who did it and how the world
permitted such a thing. I have attended several programs at the Illinois
Holocaust Museum. I have read Laurence
Rees’s masterpiece, The Holocaust: A New History. Some of my most widely read blog posts concerned
the Holocaust or were film reviews of Holocaust related films (e.g. Son of Saul
and Austerlitz). Last year, I wrote an
impassioned blog opposing the proposed Polish law which would have prohibited
the use of the term “Polish Holocaust.” (http://commonsense-mark.blogspot.com/2018/03/polish-folly.html) I began to understand the dehumanization of
the Jews and other “undesirables” that the Nazis undertook that led to mass
killings. And they started with the
mentally infirmed.
My
shift in views have not come from my Catholic upbringing but rather my
understanding of the Holocaust and from the New Left itself. And
now I understand how incorrect my position has been.
Until
recently, the Left was careful to camouflage itself. It covered itself in
innocuous and libertarian language- "women's health " "women's
choice," "safe, legal and rare." It lured us in with the
3% Lie of Planned Parenthood. And it got people like me to take the bait.
How can a libertarian be against women's choice?
But
the New Left has been exposed for where it is really going and what really goes
on and the abject hideousness and inhumanity of it. There was the film of the
National Abortion Federation with abortionists yukking it up about rolling
eyeballs. There was Michelle Wolfe sickly joking at the National
Correspondents dinner with her liberal audience laughing and clapping like a
bunch of trained seals, "He [Mike Pence] thinks abortion is murder. Which first of all, don't knock it 'til you try it---and when you do try it, really knock it. You know, you've got to get that baby out of there." There were the films of Planned Parenthood
staff bargaining over the sale of baby parts. There was Gosnell and
now NY passing its law permitting abortion until birth and then cheering this
“accomplishment” and celebrating it in the city with pink lights.
We
began with "choice" and we ended with Michelle Wolfe, rolling eyeballs and auctioning body parts.
If
you want more to read on how dehumanization works, please see the films
Austerlitz (http://commonsense-mark.blogspot.com/2017/04/austerlitz.html) and
Son of Saul (http://commonsense-mark.blogspot.com/2016/02/son-of-saul.html) ,
both of which affected me greatly. In Son of Saul, the Nazis referred to
the corpses as "pieces" to disguise the ghastliness of what was actually
going on.
My
libertarian stance did not take into account the evils of Leftist
Incrementalism. First trimester and Safe, Legal and Rare were only
the jumping off points. And here we are
now- up to the moment of birth—and
cheering about it. Bet that the New
York statute isn't the end point either. It never is. There is
always a new frontier and new boundaries to push. Now, under the proposed Virginia statute, I’m
not certain that you could get a conviction on Kermit Gosnell.
So
now it’s out in the open. The same folks
that abandoned anytime, anywhere inspections for the Iranian nuclear program have
embraced anytime, anywhere abortions.
And the governor is on record suggesting that a post-birth abortion
might also be an option.
If
you like your baby, you can keep your baby.
But if you don’t, the Left is ok with that, too.
Just
remember, the Nazi regime did not start with the ovens.
No comments:
Post a Comment