I am hoping that the Board of
Directors and leadership of the AWM does not succumb to the insidious trend of
purging writers that do not conform to the norms of political correctness or
otherwise engage in censorship or de-legitimizing American authors.
The Association for Library
Service to Children recently voted to change the name of the Laura Ingalls
Wilder Award to the bland and innocuous Children’s Literature Legacy
Award. The ALSC’s board made that
decision because, “her body of work, includes expressions of stereotypical
attitudes inconsistent with ALSC’s core values of inclusiveness, integrity and
respect, and responsiveness.” It is
widely thought that this “demotion” of Ms. Wilder is yet another instance of
politically correct administrators and educators lowering the stature of a
noted author because he or she does not conform to today’s social norms and
viewpoints or what a select group of individuals believe that the correct
social norms and viewpoints ought to be.
The demotion of Laura Ingalls
Wilder and the commensurate implied criticism of her work is all the more
ironic since the American Writers Museum recently had a special exhibit
dedicated to her life and work. The
exhibit nudged me to read Prairie Fires:
The American Dreams of Laura Ingalls Wilder by Caroline Fraser. I also attended the presentation at AWM by
Marta McDowell and purchased her work The
World of Laura Ingalls Wilder, and have begun to read some of Wilder’s
work. In doing so, I learned a great
deal about this remarkable woman. She
was not only a gifted writer but a true American. Her work belongs on the same shelf with Ben
Franklin’s Autobiography, Thoreau’s Walden and Cather’s My Antonia as a testament to the American pioneer grit. She lived through economic downturns,
including the Great Depression, lived in poverty most of her life, suffered
numerous personal setbacks, began her writing career late in life and remained
resilient and undeterred throughout.
Wilder moved from place to place, trying to make a go of it, suffering
through fires, droughts, grasshopper plagues, and other disasters. She exemplified the American spirit and
found joy and happiness in many of the simpler things in life, and left a
legacy for generations of children.
Yet, the ALSC chose to demote her
while the AWM chose to honor her.
Her demotion by the ALSC comes at
a time of other similar occurrences.
Mark Twain was taken off the reading list at a Minnesota school district
as was Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird.
Penguin recently removed literary giant Lionel Shriver from her position
as a judge of literary short story works largely because of her criticism of
Penguin’s emphasis of “inclusiveness” over quality. It’s one thing to relegate a team mascot such as Chief Illiniwek or
Chief Yahoo of the Cleveland Indians to the dustbin. It is yet another to purge authors and
writings from our literary heritage.
Wilder’s depictions of Native
Americans were borne out of a time in which the brutal Indian Wars were still
fresh in the memory of her family.
While some of her references to Native Americans were racist, there is also
evidence that she also empathized with them, as biographer Caroline Fraser
asserts. And the narrative of the
clashes between the settlers and Native Americans is still being re-examined as
evidenced by the recent book The Earth is Weeping by Peter Cozzens.
Technology changes. Social norms change. Even Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton opposed
marriage equality a decade ago. If we purge
our literary heritage of every writer that evidenced a whiff of racism or
racist language, misogyny, religious bigotry, homophobia or other kind of bias
from pre-WWII writing, there likely wouldn’t be much left to read. Writers such as Ezra Pound and James T.
Farrell would certainly be thrown overboard.
AWM is doing a fine job of bring
back into our consciousness important writers from all periods of our rich literary
tradition—from Thoreau to Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells and James Baldwin. That
approach permits us to take pride in the glorious parts of our past, as well as
face the inglorious parts. I applaud AMW’s decision to honor Laura
Ingalls Wilder and I am grateful that it did.
It exposed me to her remarkable work and life. I implore AWM to continue in this vein, to
continue to honor America’s literary giants that have withstood the test of
time, to highlight great writers that
have added to America’s literary tradition, whether or not their writing
conforms to today’s language and social norms.
We desperately need to hear their stories in the context in which they
were written and not sanitized through the filter of political
correctness.
Mark, this is such an important topic and I'm glad you brought it to my attention. Among the many disservices to humanity is the suppression of historical writers who exercised language that expressed the sentiments and perceptions of the time. How can present day readers begin to understand the injustice of the past without having a chance to walk in the footprints of those who lived in those times? What we acknowledge today as racism did not prevent people in the time from experiencing empathy for people being robbed of their way of life in the name of westward expansion of white culture. At the same time, people feeling threatened always feel defensive and strong emotions of resentment for those threatening them. I'm with you, let's fight for Laura Ingalls Wilder to remain as an example of our history. Better to supplement it with more modern interpretations than snuff it!
ReplyDelete