A few weeks ago, liberals had a meltdown when Donald Trump tweeted the following:
"With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for the country!"
Liberals interpreted this tweet as affirmation that Trump was about to shut down the free press and eras the First Amendment with an Executive Order, putting a chill on the opposition.
The FCC itself immediately shot down this suggestion, stating only that the FCC believes in the 1st Amendment.
This is the last we've heard of this nonsense. Trump took no action whatsoever to follow up on this tweet.
There are a couple of ways to interpret Trump's tweet. Of course, the MSM interpreted it as a challenge to the First Amendment and as direct evidence of Trump's fascist inclinations.
I took it a little differently. Yes, it was a little too close to challenging free speech for my comfort. But tweets without action are meaningless. They are just tweets --petulant rantings. This tweet is nothing more than that of the guy at the end of the bar that exclaims, "there oughta be a law!" Trump was, however, correct to call out NBC and the Networks for propagation of unsubstantiated narratives, many of which were initiated with the support only of anonymous sources. He was wrong, however, to do so while making a statement that could be read to be an implied threat to their license. If a remark can be read two ways, it will ALWAYS be cast in the least favorable light by the MSM.
And this is the most confounding characteristic of Donald Trump. He is often right and wrong at the same time.
Meanwhile, while the press and social media were hyperventilating over this tweet, real threats to free speech continue to mount on university grounds across the country. Those threats have been sometimes backed by actual violence as at Berkeley or Middlebury. Threats of violence and disruptions have also become more common.
Just in the past week, a Princeton student published an opinion piece that asserted that conservatives have no 1st Amendment right to free speech. It is troublesome that Princeton actually admitted such an ignoramus, worse yet that The Daily Princetonian chose to print his absurd assertion. At UC Santa Cruz, protesters crashed a college Republican meeting, claiming that "fascists don't have a right to free speech." Incidents like these are now all too common across college campuses, the training ground for the next generation of our citizenry.
No, I don't like the way Trump expressed his frustration with the MSM, which often acts straightaway as a public advocacy arm of the DNC. But without follow up executive action by Trump, I am much less concerned about his misguided tweet than I am about the actual suffocation of free speech in our universities.
Seeking to restoring intellectual vitality to conservatism and libertarianism thought through fair minded social commentary on politics, economics, society, science, religion, film, literature and sometimes sports. Unapologetically biased toward free people and free markets.
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
Saturday, October 14, 2017
Pushback
There seems to be an unending
stream of bad news assaulting us. North
Korean nukes. Threatened pullout of the
U.S. from JCPOA with Iran. The Las
Vegas massacre. Burning controversies
over Columbus Day, the National Anthem, and now the Boy Scouts. Trump fighting
with Democrats AND Republicans and maybe his own State Department. Tom Petty gone, pronounced dead prematurely
but sadly, he is really dead. I don’t
believe I’ve experienced a more tumultuous time in my lifetime; the 60’s are
beginning to look like child’s play.
Twenty-five years after the end of the Cold War, when the End of History
was announced, it appears that the American Experiment, and the notions of
individual liberty and the Enlightenment are on the ropes. State power and supranational power (here and abroad seems to have made great advances.
Across the West and elsewhere, progressives
and globalists have largely been successful since the end of the Cold War in
taking power, decision making and accountability away from localized sovereign
states and placing it in the hands of an unaccountable body. Multiculturalism goes hand in glove with this
trend—that is denying local culture and social norms, and in particular,
denying any claim that the locals have that they like their culture more and
putting everyone on the same plane.
Nowhere is this more prevalent than in Europe. In Europe, the global elitists sometimes go
so far as to blatantly deny their own culture, as Emmanual Macron did during
his campaign in France, when he asserted that “there is no such thing as French
culture.” That kind of absurd thinking
exists only in the minds of the global elite.
There most certainly is a decidedly French culture, just as there is an
American culture (and even within America there are certainly regional
subcultures). And politically, separate
cultures tend to want the right of self determination----they don’t want to be
governed by a far-off group.
The globalist elite have managed
to achieve a greater degree of political power centralization in three ways. First, through crisis creation. Whether it be climate change, or, in the
U.S. health care, the Statists have
argued that these are big problems that require big government or even
supranational solutions. Second, they
label opponents: xenophobic,
Islamophobic, sexist, populist, white nationalist, climate change deniers, and
the like. Hillary Clinton famously
labelled her opponents “Deplorables.” It forces opponents to fight the label,
rather than argue on the merits of any particular policy. Third, they argue against the intelligence
of the choice of the people as if it delegitimizes them. In both the U.S. 2016 election and in the
U.K. Brexit vote, the MSM took great pains to demonstrate that the people that
voted for Trump or for Brexit were, on average, less educated, less informed,
and more provincial—the great unwashed masses.
And, of course, the bigger the government, the more it siphons off
resources from individuals.
Across the globe, the forces of
Big Government and multiculturalism have largely been prevailing as of late,
there have been several notable instances of green shoots of autonomy popping up.
In the U.S. of course, was the
surprise election of Donald Trump. Yes,
he is blunt, crass, impulsive, and says odd things. But as I asserted in an earlier blog, his
most significant campaign promise was, “I am your voice.” As the Obama administration wore on, Obama
turned to memos and executive orders to impose his agenda. Nowhere was that more apparent than the
transgender bathroom wars started by an Obama memo. I don’t know what the right policy is, but I
do know that the wrong policy is to have the federal government dictate what
should be done by fiat, without discussion or input and impose its will on a
local school system. It was exactly
acts like that that put Trump in the White House.
Brexit also was a reaction to an
overbearing E.U. busily imposing lots of rules and regulations from afar
without any input from the locals at all. It was also in part, a rejection of the
immigration policies of the E.U. which caused social disruption in Europe (more
on this in another blog). One British
immigrant told me that the economy of her entire fishing village was nearly
destroyed with picayune rules issued by Brussels. And she further decided to leave when she got
tired of working so hard to pay for the social benefits bestowed on nonworking
immigrants.
Poland, Hungary and the Czech
Republic are also pushing back. Seeing
what the open door immigration policies have done to the rest of Europe, those
countries have asserted their sovereignty and are pushing back hard against the
E.U. Just last week, thousands of Poles
lined up at the border to pray for their country. Each of those countries do have definite cultures
and have also had recent experience with Russians (or Nazis) trying to shove
their cultures down their throats. They
are willing to withstand the labeling and perhaps the financial penalties to preserve
theirs.
Most recently, both the Catalonians
and Kurds actually had a vote for independence. In both cases, the voters voted
overwhelmingly to be independent. In both cases, those peoples have distinct
cultures and the yearning for independence has been brewing for some time. The case of Catalonia was particularly
obscene because we witnessed Spanish police in black disrupting and taking over
polling places by force and state violence.
One couldn’t help but compare it to the thuggery of the Iranian regime
when it put down the Green Revolution.
The Kurdish push for independence is also noteworthy since the resilient
Kurds have fought against Saddam Hussein, ISIS, and Turkey for decades. They continue to fight for liberation in the
world’s worst neighborhood.
The genius of our Founders was
that they designed a government that largely was intended to vest political
power locally because they knew that the farther you get away, the less
accountability and deference there is to local social norms and practices. While
we have seen a movement toward centralizing power, there are places across the
globe where people are pushing back.
Even voters in Illinois pushed back. You know there is hope when
corrupt, single party Illinois repeals a tax.
In a historic vote, the ill-advised soda tax put into place in Cook
County was repealed last week, in a historic vote. A sure sign that a desire for local control,
lower taxes and sanity have not been totally extinguished.
Sunday, October 1, 2017
Final Thoughts
I normally don’t write successive
posts on the same topic, but the furor over the NFL protests hits home because
of my affinity for the game over a lifetime. And, if you have read my prior posts, I find
symbolism to be important in human affairs.
Donald Trump’s comments, like most of his positions, are both wrong and
right. He is entirely correct to call
out the players and NFL for permitting kneeling during the national
anthem. No other great nation would
countenance that. He is entirely incorrect
when he says that the NFL should pass a rule around standing at the national
anthem. It already has policies around
that. The State should not interfere in
private company matters, and the consumers of the NFL’s product will ultimately
decide whether they wish to experience public grievance as part of their ticket
price.
I attended the first Chicago
Bears game of the season at the invitation of a business associate. As I left and walked through the tunnel, an
older African American gentleman with an NFL jersey with the name “Stingley” on the back was navigating through the crowd just in front of
me. I couldn’t help but nudge his
elbow. “Cool jersey,” I said, “I
remember watching the game on that day.
It still makes me sad.” “Darryl
was my cousin,” he said. “I’m so sorry,”
I replied. As some of you older people
may remember, Darryl Stingley was injured by a horrific hit by Jack Tatum which
rendered Stingley a quadriplegic in a pre-season game in 1978. It was a horrible thing to have witnessed on
T.V. Sadly Darryl Stingley passed away
about 10 years ago at age 55 and Jack Tatum also passed away at age 61. Stingley and Tatum never spoke after the hit
and Tatum never apologized. Neither
reached his 65th birthday.
The gentleman and I went on to have
a nice conversation while we worked our way through the crowd. We talked about football in the public league
(where Stingley and I both played), the South Side of Chicago, and the Bears. We talked about what we do for a living, our
children, the City of Chicago, and a few other things on our way back to our
cars. Two strangers, from two walks of
life, two different neighborhoods, one black, one white, connected by the
common bond of football and a tragically memorable event. That’s what football brings. A chance to unify and to connect in a special
way. By letting political grievances
seep in, the NFL is going to destroy these precious moments.
The NFL has gotten out of the
sports and entertainment business and has gotten into the grievance mongering
business. What is NFL football,
really? It is fun, fake inter-city
tribalism. Your guys are going to play
our guys. During the playoffs, mayors
get into the act, betting each other some nominal wagers. The cities adorn themselves in the colors and
symbols of their team. Guys talk about
it in bars. People talk about it around
the water cooler on Monday morning. But
it’s all fake. We don’t really hate the
guys in Cleveland or Pittsburgh. For
Pete’s sake, the players aren’t even from that city. It’s all fun.
One good aspect of all this is
that the reaction to Kaepernick has brought to light a number of unpleasant
facts about the NFL and the crony capitalist bedrock upon which it rests.
But now, instead of a spectacle
of fake tribalism the NFL has chosen to contaminate its product with real
tribalism, real social tension, and real bitterness. Most perversely, the league has chosen to
permit millionaire players to disrespect the flag, the anthem, and is following
the lead of a guy that also sports emblems showing support of Castro and Che
and that disrespects police officers.
It’s disappointing and sad that
the NFL has decided to become a wholly owned subsidiary of the left leaning MSM
cartel – CNN, MSNBC, NYT and WaPo. At a
time when we need more platforms and
venues that promote unity, the NFL has decided to permit its players to play victim
in a way that is perfectly calculated to push us farther apart—by protesting
the national anthem and the American flag.
The reality is that the NFL's business model involves a series of licenses. In fact, your ticket to a game is actually a license granted by the team that permit you access to the stadium and the game. TV and cable arrangements are a series of licenses. But in reality, the licenses flow both ways. Fans also grant the NFL a license to their time and attention. In person, pro sports fans are willing to subject themselves to messaging by sponsors of products in a variety of ways-- ads for products and services are placed in programs, around the stadium premises, in the program and on the jumbotron. At home, we willingly subject ourselves to advertisements and interruptions (T.V. timeouts). These messages are claims on our time, which we are willing to license back to the NFL. But now the NFL has begun to transmit political messages which many of us find obnoxious and annoying. It's one thing to see an ad for beer or razor blades; it's an entirely different thing to see messages from the disciples of a guy that wears a Castro t-shirt and pig socks. It is abusive of the implicit license on our time that we grant to the NFL.
I won’t be part of it. It’s sad because pro football (along with
college and high school) has been a common bond with many people during my
lifetime. I won’t. If I go to a game, or
watch one on TV, I want fake tribalism, not the real kind.
To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, I didn’t leave the NFL. The NFL left me.
To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, I didn’t leave the NFL. The NFL left me.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)