Will Smith as Dr. Bennet Omalu pointing to the N.F.L. representative and through gritted teeth, imploring him to, "Tell the truth!" about CTE is one of the more powerful scenes from this year's films. Will Smith didn't get nominated (that's a whole separate post), but his performance in Concussion was outstanding and it is one of three recent and important films that deal with the theme of finding and disclosing truth---truth that is being held back by powerful forces that have a self interest in telling a different narrative. Concussion, Spotlight, and 13 Hours each evokes anger and dismay from the viewers by showing how vested bureaucracies will sometimes stop at nothing and will bury peoples' lives and careers to retain power. Each demonstrates why investigative journalists and filmmakers have a vital role to play in an open society and why the current tide against "offensive" speech is so misguided.
We need to know the truth so we can deal with it.
The N.F.L. clearly has an interest in controlling the narrative around the long term effects of head trauma. It has long been known that football players suffer debilitating injuries that leave them limping and sore for the rest of their lives. Dick Butkus and Wilbur Marshall, for instance, had to sue to collect disability payments from their playing day injuries. But it has been only recently that the Alzheimer's like symptoms of former players have become widely known. Like tobacco use, it turns out that the effects of playing only show up years later. The N.F.L. has downplayed CTE for years, and attempted to throw a blanket over Omalu's work. It became harder to do so as more player suicides began to hit the headlines and more reports of symptoms of the effects of head trauma from ex-players like Jim McMahon and Antwan Randall El have made it difficult for the N.F.L. to sweep under the rug. But they tried and went to great lengths to silence and discredit Omalu. The reality is that only by dealing with the truth--understanding fully the evidence and the data--will the N.F.L. be able to save itself and the game of football. We do not fully understand the extent of the risk (CTE currently can only be determined by examining the brain of someone deceased) but more research will help determine rule changes and technologies in equipment that may reduces the risk of long term problems.
The film Spotlight centers around the Boston Globe investigative reporting team that did a spectacular job of uncovering the pathology of child sex abuse in the Boston Archdiocese. The Catholic Church was a powerful institution in Irish Catholic Boston with adherents at the highest level of business, government, and courts. Because these forces closed ranks, the Archdiocese was able to cover up the continued transferring of pedophile priests that ruined the lives of hundreds and hundreds of vulnerable children. Because they preyed kids from lower economic classes with dysfunctional families, their actions were even more despicable. The institution that is supposed to be an advocate for the disempowered instead victimized them. That team at the Boston Globe courageously took on the Archdiocese and exposed the Church despite the implicit threats to their careers and helped put an end to outrageous practice of circulating offending priests from parish to parish.
In 13 Hours, the filmmaker largely left politics out of the film and let the facts speak for themselves. You will recall that Susan Rice went on the talk show circuit immediately after the Benghazi attack to propagate the fiction that the attack on our embassy was the result of a protest against an anti-Muslim video. This film dispels that myth and shows that the State Department left that embassy woefully undefended and then did not respond to pleas for help when there were military assets available. Only the bravery and fighting ability of a handful of CIA contractors kept the death toll from being even worse. The Clinton State Department spun a tale that was simply not true to protect Clinton and the re-election chances of her boss. By sticking very close to the facts, Michael Bay fully discredits the fairy tale of Clinton and Rice without every mentioning them.
Film is a reflection of the times. It is not fortuitous that these three films were released within months of one another. We need to know the facts. We need courageous journalists and filmmakers that are willing to risk their careers (and even their lives) to expose the truth. Louis Brandeis once famously said that "Sunlight is the best disinfectant." We need to know the likelihood of head injuries in football so we have fewer good men like Junior Seaus, Dave Duersons and Mike Websters meet tragic endings. We need to know how institutions like the Catholic Church screen and monitor priests so that we don't have systemic abuse of kids. The country needs a full accounting of all of the facts leading up to the deaths in Benghazi to ensure that it doesn't happen again and because Mrs. Clinton is asking us to promote her to commander in chief. In each of these cases, the existing power structure -- the N.F.L., the Catholic Church and the State Department attempted to whitewash the facts and tell a different tale. Taken together, these films show that no institution is above challenge and we need always to view their narratives with an amount of skepticism.
Mrs. Clinton somewhat infamously proclaimed, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
When there is harm, it makes all the difference.
Seeking to restoring intellectual vitality to conservatism and libertarianism thought through fair minded social commentary on politics, economics, society, science, religion, film, literature and sometimes sports. Unapologetically biased toward free people and free markets.
Monday, January 25, 2016
Saturday, January 16, 2016
Why I Think Trump Can Win All the Marbles
Donald Trump has, I believe, moved from a curiosity piece-- viewed by many as a bombastic, unfiltered, blowhard-- to the front of the pack, and at the moment, has become the overall favorite to win the 2016 election. Here's why:
- He puts America first. After seven years of nonstop apologizing for America, from the Cairo speech to his denial of American exceptionalism, to his news conference in Malaysia where he said, "America has some work to do," Obama and his team have unloaded nonstop criticism at America. "America is a nation of cowards," complained Eric Holder. "Racism is in our DNA," proclaimed Obama. Neither of those broadsides is true. America is a nation of heroes, and entrepreneurship, independence and resourcefulness is in our DNA. We need a leader that is willing to extol our virtues and be a cheerleader and advocate. Our brand sells. And sometimes we need our leaders to remind us about how good we have been and can be. Trump starts with the slogan, "Make America Great Again as his starting point. With the current officeholder, you sometimes wonder whose side he's on. The image above is painful. No American wants to see our sailors at gunpoint on their knees. But John Kerry was not only ok with it, he thanked the mullahs for their prompt return of our sailors after parading them in this pose in their propaganda photos and videos. Americans are tired of bowing.
- He bites back. He is unafraid to take opponents head on. When Hillary trotted Bill out to the campaign trail and simultaneously touted women's rights, he didn't hold back about Hillary's role in enabling Bill and destroying the women he preyed on. When Cruz disparaged "New York values," he jumped on how New Yorkers responded to 9/11. Trump is fearless when hitting back hard is necessary. It's something Mitt Romney could never do.
- He is direct and truthful. You might not like what he has to say, but he doesn't spend a lot of time clarifying his statements or walking them back. People are tired of P.C., tiptoeing around issues, fear of offending this person or that. In contrast, when asked about whether he would invade Iraq again (a question he had to know was coming), issued several clarifying statements after his initial answer. I still don't know exactly what he said. For better or worse, there is none of that with Trump. When asked again about his proposal temporarily halt Muslim immigration to the U.S. after he was attacked by members of his own party, he simply refused. He understands that we are tired of political correctness. An anchor baby is an anchor baby. Barring students from chanting "USA" (as Wisconsin sports authority just did) or barring professors from referring to America as "the land of opportunity" as the University of California did will not be well received in a Trump administration.But even worse has been the systematic peddling of untruths by the Obama administration. From blaming Benghazi on a filmmaker, to claiming that ISIS is "contained," to asserting that "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor," to Obama's refusal to use the term "Radical Islam," Obama's crew has tried to sell obvious falsehoods. And most voters are tired of it. Trump at least appears to be able to give it to you straight up, and let it stand on its own merits.
- Islamic terror. I'm not sure a complete bar to Muslim immigration, even temporarily, is the correct answer, but Trump is at least unafraid to confront the issue head on. Obama has consistently downplayed the threat and made American security subordinate to political correctness. His staff can't even use the term "radical Islam." He labeled ISIS as the "J.V." and asserted that it was contained. He told Christians to get off their "high horse" on religious violence. He is bleeding out dangerous inmates from Gitmo. He is willing to take on Syrian refugees even though our vetting process doesn't work and the assaults on women in Europe are rampant. Women in Austria are being told not to go out at night. Jews in France are being warned not to wear yamulkes. ISIS has told the world that they have infiltrated refugees. Trump wants to at least press the "pause" button. He will not be constrained by P.C. in dealing with this real and complex problem.
- He comes off as a little impulsive. Our adversaries know that they can act with impunity with Obama. Iran fires off missiles and there are no consequence. Russia invades Crimea and tells us to butt out of Syria and there are no consequences. China builds islands and there are no consequences. North Korea tests...and nothing happens. It is good to remember that Iran released our hostages as soon as Reagan took office. North Vietnam invaded the South only after Nixon left office. In both cases, they were a little afraid of what the consequences would be. A little uncertainty in the minds of our enemies can be a good thing.
- He is an outsider. The Republican Establishment is flummoxed by him. Somehow, the losses of Eric Cantor and John Boehner and the poll numbers of Trump, Ted Cruz, and Ben Carson haven't quite penetrated their minds. The Republican Establishment is a losing horse. Ronald Reagan proved that 35 years ago. It is one of the reasons why Jeb Bush can't get any traction. Hillary has more baggage than American Airlines and United Airlines combined could handle, but they only chance of beating her is outside the establishment. That a missing persons report on Mitch McConnell appears to be ready to be filed should tell the RNC something.
- People are angry. I like and respect Nikki Haley, but her gratuitous poke at Trump for being an "angry voice" evidences the tone deafness of the Republican party. People are angry. They are angry that their wages are shrinking. They are angry about an overreaching, unaccountable government that encroaches in nearly every aspect of their lives. They are angry over an America that is getting sand kicked in its face at every turn. They are angry at being told they are bigots every time they express themselves. They are angry because they are struggling to feed their own families when we are letting other countries flood us with people that have to be supported with tax dollars. Trump has figured out how to tap into that anger and frustration and responded to Nikki Haley in Trump style, "I accept the mantle of anger," he proclaimed.
This is not to say I am endorsing Trump. I have lots of issues with him. His animosity toward free trade is dangerous. His bromance with Putin is misplaced. His policies are devoid of details. But I think I have to begin to come to terms with a possible Trump presidency.
At least there will be no doubt as to whose side he's on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)